The D.C. political paper produces a magazine. Critics pounce.
Good afternoon. The digital edition of our June 28th issue is now available online.
Read Deirdre McCloskey’s cover story on the creepy new economics of pleasure, John McWhorter on Mitt Romney’s verbal stylings, Geoffrey Wheatcroft on Queen Elizabeth’s jubilee, Drew Gilpin Faust on Paul Fussell’s legacy, Paul Berman on Chen Guangcheng’s great escape, and Jeffrey Rosen on liberals’ discovery of a theory to crush conservative jurisprudence.
Also, don’t miss Timothy Noah’s TRB column on Mayor Bloomberg’s war on soda, Isaac Chotiner on Jonah Lehrer’s “Creativity,” Peter Green on Homer, Leon Wieseltier on foreign policy sophistry, and much more.
Check out TNR’s newest issue, featuring Charles Homans on the 2012 campaign’s biggest donor, Noam Scheiber on how Barack Obama became Bill Clinton, Alec MacGillis on the future of labor’s relationship with the Democratic Party, and the editors on the moral dimension of the health care ruling.
Read TNR’s Books and Arts section for Stanley Kauffmann on films and see excellent pieces by David Hajdu on Adele, Paul Starr on compromise, and Leon Wieseltier on the necessity of both defending and criticizing Israel. The issue also features poems by Rowan Ricardo Phillips and the late Wislawa Szymborska.
Check out tnr.com for access to this content and much more!
Here is a letter from Chris to TNR readers, explaining his new role at the magazine.
To the Readers of The New Republic:
Nearly 100 years ago, the founding editors of The New Republic wrote these words to introduce their inaugural issue:
The New Republic is frankly an experiment. It is an attempt to find national audience for a journal of interpretation and opinion. Many people believe that such a journal is out of place in America; that if a periodical is to be popular, it must first of all be entertaining, or that if it is to be serious, it must be detached and select.
Yet when the plan of The New Republic was being discussed it received spontaneous welcome from people in all parts of the country. They differed in theories and programmes; but they agreed that if The New Republic could bring sufficient enlightenment to the problems of the nation and sufficient sympathy to its complexities, it would service all those who feel the challenge of our time.
A century later, people are once again skeptical that quality journalism can flourish. Technology’s disruption of traditional forms of media has led many to believe that independent, thoughtful media institutions are on the decline and that there are not enough readers to support serious reporting and analysis.
But in 1914 the founders of The New Republic chose to strike out and pursue their vision in spite of the prevailing opinions of their time. They saw a need for a magazine of informed opinion and insightful, thorough reporting.
I share their vision. It seems that today too many media institutions chase superficial metrics of online virality at the expense of investing in rigorous reporting and analysis of the most important stories of our time. When few people are investing in media institutions with such bold aims as “enlightenment to the problems of the nation,” I believe we must.
To read the rest of Chris’s letter head over to TNR.com and see why we remain steadfast in our commitment to in-depth reporting and forward thinking journalism.
Our August 18, 2011 Issue