How should libraries adapt to the modern era?
They are, in their very different ways, monuments of American civilization. The first is a building: a grand, beautiful Beaux-Arts structure of marble and stone occupying two blocks’ worth of Fifth Avenue in midtown Manhattan. The second is a delicate concoction of metal, plastic, and glass, just four and a half inches long, barely a third of an inch thick, and weighing five ounces. The first is the Stephen A. Schwarzman Building, the main branch of the New York Public Library (NYPL). The second is an iPhone. Yet despite their obvious differences, for many people today they serve the same purpose: to read books. And in a development that even just thirty years ago would have seemed like the most absurd science fiction, there are now far more books available, far more quickly, on the iPhone than in the New York Public Library.
It has been clear for some time now that this development would pose one of the greatest challenges that modern libraries—from institutions like the NYPL on down—have ever encountered. Put bluntly, one of their core functions now faces the prospect of obsolescence. What role will libraries have when patrons no longer need to go to them to consult or to borrow books? This question has already spurred massive commentary and discussion. But in the past year, as large-scale controversies have developed around several libraries, it has become pressing and unavoidable.
David A. Bell — “The Bookless Library”
- jahnnasbrain reblogged this from thenewrepublic
- narrativemag likes this
- sn00dle likes this
- happinessinthemountainss likes this
- homecomingqueen reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
- inholland-1945 likes this
- truth-has-a-liberal-bias reblogged this from thenewrepublic
- alexandrahanschell likes this
- utnereader likes this
- bitsymetcalf likes this
- nickturse likes this
- thenewrepublic posted this