The New Republic

The New Republic

Scroll to Top

  • Profile
  • Pages
  • Likes
  • About The New Republic

    Thought-provoking, unbiased coverage of politics, culture, and the world of ideas. Follow us on Twitter: @tnr

  • Connect with me

  • RSS
  • Archive
  • Ask me anything

Stuff I Like

  • Photoset via gq
    Be Our Guest!: Comparing the Staffs of Downton Abbey and Beauty and the Beast

    Naturally, those...

    Photoset via gq
  • Photo via nypl

    The NYPL is a proud contributor to a stunning new virtual exhibition called Leaving Europe: A...

    Photo via nypl
  • Video via theatlantic

    Is It Hot Enough to Cook an Egg on the Watergate Roof? Yes.

    The Atlantic senior editors make...

    Video via theatlantic
  • Photo via ilovecharts

    Full color version of this chart.

    Chart was done by Jenna Brager for Shareable’s new e-book,

    Photo via ilovecharts
  • Photo via theweekmagazine

    “No media magnate bears a closer resemblance to Potter archvillain Lord Voldemort than Murdoch,...

    Photo via theweekmagazine
“Part of Roberts’ decision, joined by the dissenters, limited the federal government’s ability to dictate how states use Medicaid funds—and in a way that could have serious effects. Roberts and the conservatives accepted the argument that the federal government effectively coerced the states by threatening to withdraw existing Medicaid funds if they do not expand the program, as the Affordable Care Act calls upon them to do.
This makes the expansion of Medicaid essentially voluntary. The federal government is picking up most of these costs, so most states will take the deal anyway. But states could decline to expand if they chose—and it’s not clear (to me) what happens then. In addition, that part of the ruling could limit the federal government’s leverage over states in the future.”
-Jon Cohn, “Supreme Court Rules, Obamacare Can Go Forward”
Zoom Info

“Part of Roberts’ decision, joined by the dissenters, limited the federal government’s ability to dictate how states use Medicaid funds—and in a way that could have serious effects. Roberts and the conservatives accepted the argument that the federal government effectively coerced the states by threatening to withdraw existing Medicaid funds if they do not expand the program, as the Affordable Care Act calls upon them to do.

This makes the expansion of Medicaid essentially voluntary. The federal government is picking up most of these costs, so most states will take the deal anyway. But states could decline to expand if they chose—and it’s not clear (to me) what happens then. In addition, that part of the ruling could limit the federal government’s leverage over states in the future.”

-Jon Cohn, “Supreme Court Rules, Obamacare Can Go Forward”

June 28, 2012
4 notes

Share
http://tmblr.co/Zej2AyOICO4w
health caresupreme courtobamacaremandateSCOTUS

4 notes

  1. houseoforange likes this
  2. cubicmetaphysics likes this
  3. sarahlee310 likes this
  4. newsfloozie reblogged this from thenewrepublic
  5. thenewrepublic posted this

< Previous post Next post >

Theme by Pixel Union