The New Republic

The New Republic

Scroll to Top

  • Profile
  • Pages
  • Likes
  • About The New Republic

    Thought-provoking, unbiased coverage of politics, culture, and the world of ideas. Follow us on Twitter: @tnr

  • Connect with me

    • Instagram" title="My Instagram Profile">Instagram
  • RSS
  • Archive
  • Ask me anything

Stuff I Like

  • Photoset via gq
    Be Our Guest!: Comparing the Staffs of Downton Abbey and Beauty and the Beast

    Naturally, those...

    Photoset via gq
  • Photo via nypl

    The NYPL is a proud contributor to a stunning new virtual exhibition called Leaving Europe: A...

    Photo via nypl
  • Video via theatlantic

    Is It Hot Enough to Cook an Egg on the Watergate Roof? Yes.

    The Atlantic senior editors make...

    Video via theatlantic
  • Photo via ilovecharts

    Full color version of this chart.

    Chart was done by Jenna Brager for Shareable’s new e-book,

    Photo via ilovecharts
  • Photo via theweekmagazine

    “No media magnate bears a closer resemblance to Potter archvillain Lord Voldemort than Murdoch,...

    Photo via theweekmagazine
Should Supreme Court justices have term limits?
“Life terms might make sense if Supreme Court justices had life spans comparable to those of rock stars. But they don’t. Possibly because they don’t typically abuse drugs, or possibly because they don’t fly as often on private planes, Supreme Court justices live much, much longer than rock stars. And because they usually aspire to leaving office feet first—a goal often met—they’re much more likely to become gaga on the job. Another problem is that longevity has made the Supreme Court confirmation process extremely partisan and contentious—the stakes are just too absurdly high. The era of bitter Supreme Court confirmation fights—some say the era of bitter partisan politics in general—began in 1987, when Democrats defeated Reagan’s nomination of Robert Bork. That was a quarter-century ago, and if Sen. Ted Kennedy, D.-Mass., hadn’t played it pretty rough (“Robert Bork’s America is a land in which women would be forced into back-alley abortions, blacks would sit at segregated lunch counters, rogue police could break down citizens’ doors in midnight raids, schoolchildren could not be taught about evolution,” etc.) then Bork, who turned 85 last month, would probably still be sitting on the Court.”
- Timothy Noah, Life Sentences
Photo courtesy of MSNBC
Zoom

Should Supreme Court justices have term limits?

“Life terms might make sense if Supreme Court justices had life spans comparable to those of rock stars. But they don’t. Possibly because they don’t typically abuse drugs, or possibly because they don’t fly as often on private planes, Supreme Court justices live much, much longer than rock stars. And because they usually aspire to leaving office feet first—a goal often met—they’re much more likely to become gaga on the job. Another problem is that longevity has made the Supreme Court confirmation process extremely partisan and contentious—the stakes are just too absurdly high. The era of bitter Supreme Court confirmation fights—some say the era of bitter partisan politics in general—began in 1987, when Democrats defeated Reagan’s nomination of Robert Bork. That was a quarter-century ago, and if Sen. Ted Kennedy, D.-Mass., hadn’t played it pretty rough (“Robert Bork’s America is a land in which women would be forced into back-alley abortions, blacks would sit at segregated lunch counters, rogue police could break down citizens’ doors in midnight raids, schoolchildren could not be taught about evolution,” etc.) then Bork, who turned 85 last month, would probably still be sitting on the Court.”

- Timothy Noah, Life Sentences

Photo courtesy of MSNBC

April 6, 2012
17 notes

Share
http://tmblr.co/Zej2AyJBWBgd
The New RepublicSupreme CourtSCOTUSlife sentencesappointmentjudgesjusticesterm limits

17 notes

  1. danaday likes this
  2. newsfloozie reblogged this from thenewrepublic
  3. apocalypsesunshine reblogged this from thenewrepublic and added:
    I like this idea, but can see it becoming problematic. For example, what happens if a number of consecutive presidents...
  4. hornysad reblogged this from thenewrepublic and added:
    yes… but only for conservative justices. i kid, i kid
  5. sunsmudge likes this
  6. thewarroomctv reblogged this from thenewrepublic
  7. doitninetimes likes this
  8. nomorepie likes this
  9. superbusydoingnothing likes this
  10. highsee likes this
  11. bookdemon likes this
  12. gangofone likes this
  13. thenewrepublic posted this

< Previous post Next post >

Theme by Pixel Union