 no-repeat 0 0; } @media only screen and (-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio: 2), only screen and (min--moz-device-pixel-ratio: 2), only screen and (-o-min-device-pixel-ratio: 2 / 1), only screen and (min-device-pixel-ratio: 2), only screen and (min-resolution: 192dpi), only screen and (min-resolution: 2dppx) { .ig-b-48 { background-image: url(//badges.instagram.com/static/images/ig-badge-sprite-48@2x.png); background-size: 60px 178px; } }</style> <a href=){kind=icon}
Read Jeffrey Rosen’s article on the many sides to the Supreme Court hearing on Obamacare, and for continuing coverage follow Jonathan Cohn’s blog.
“There is plenty of blame for this situation to go around: You can blame the lawyers and politicians on both sides; you can even, in some respects, blame the Supreme Court justices themselves. But, whoever is responsible, it’s clear that the two-year litigation marathon over health care has served to cloud and confuse what should have been a fairly straightforward constitutional debate.”
- Jeffrey Rosen, Obamacare At The Court: Contortions All Round
Miss the TNR Google+ Hangout on the SCOTUS healthcare hearing? Catch the video here.
2 notes
-
sarahlee310 likes this
-
thenewrepublic posted this
