The New Republic

The New Republic

Scroll to Top

  • Profile
  • Pages
  • Likes
  • About The New Republic

    Thought-provoking, unbiased coverage of politics, culture, and the world of ideas. Follow us on Twitter: @tnr

  • Connect with me

  • RSS
  • Archive
  • Ask me anything

Stuff I Like

  • Photoset via gq
    Be Our Guest!: Comparing the Staffs of Downton Abbey and Beauty and the Beast

    Naturally, those...

    Photoset via gq
  • Photo via nypl

    The NYPL is a proud contributor to a stunning new virtual exhibition called Leaving Europe: A...

    Photo via nypl
  • Video via theatlantic

    Is It Hot Enough to Cook an Egg on the Watergate Roof? Yes.

    The Atlantic senior editors make...

    Video via theatlantic
  • Photo via ilovecharts

    Full color version of this chart.

    Chart was done by Jenna Brager for Shareable’s new e-book,

    Photo via ilovecharts
  • Photo via theweekmagazine

    “No media magnate bears a closer resemblance to Potter archvillain Lord Voldemort than Murdoch,...

    Photo via theweekmagazine
Next week the Supreme Court hears oral arguments in the lawsuits challenging the Affordable Care Act. But is it really the “case of the century,” as pundits have started calling it?
“Rejecting the Affordable Care Act could deprive 30 million people of health insurance, weaken the coverage for tens of millions more, and alter one-sixth of the economy. In those respects, obviously, it would be a highly consequential decision. But such a ruling could also have have far-reaching legal effects, the kind Bush v. Gore did not. At least in theory, the court could use this case to redefine the boundaries of federal power, in a way that the courts have not done in nearly a century.”
- Jonathan Cohn, “Obamacare on Trial: Case of the Century?”
Photo courtesy of the Los Angeles Times 
Zoom

Next week the Supreme Court hears oral arguments in the lawsuits challenging the Affordable Care Act. But is it really the “case of the century,” as pundits have started calling it?

“Rejecting the Affordable Care Act could deprive 30 million people of health insurance, weaken the coverage for tens of millions more, and alter one-sixth of the economy. In those respects, obviously, it would be a highly consequential decision. But such a ruling could also have have far-reaching legal effects, the kind Bush v. Gore did not. At least in theory, the court could use this case to redefine the boundaries of federal power, in a way that the courts have not done in nearly a century.”

- Jonathan Cohn, “Obamacare on Trial: Case of the Century?”

Photo courtesy of the Los Angeles Times 

March 19, 2012
4 notes

Share
http://tmblr.co/Zej2AyIEn-Fq
ObamacareSupreme CourtPolitics

4 notes

  1. immenseskyanddrowned likes this
  2. dowe likes this
  3. dave1963x likes this
  4. wentdog likes this
  5. thenewrepublic posted this

< Previous post Next post >

Theme by Pixel Union